高娜娜, 倪梁红, 赵志礼, 嘎务. 基于叶绿体全基因组序列的双峰法鉴定粗茎秦艽及其近缘物种J. 药学学报, 2022, 57(8): 2520-2527. DOI: 10.16438/j.0513-4870.2022-0496
引用本文: 高娜娜, 倪梁红, 赵志礼, 嘎务. 基于叶绿体全基因组序列的双峰法鉴定粗茎秦艽及其近缘物种J. 药学学报, 2022, 57(8): 2520-2527. DOI: 10.16438/j.0513-4870.2022-0496
GAO Na-na, NI Liang-hong, ZHAO Zhi-li, Gaawe Dorje. SNP double peak methods through chloroplast genome profiling for identifying Gentiana crassicaulis and two closely related speciesJ. Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica, 2022, 57(8): 2520-2527. DOI: 10.16438/j.0513-4870.2022-0496
Citation: GAO Na-na, NI Liang-hong, ZHAO Zhi-li, Gaawe Dorje. SNP double peak methods through chloroplast genome profiling for identifying Gentiana crassicaulis and two closely related speciesJ. Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica, 2022, 57(8): 2520-2527. DOI: 10.16438/j.0513-4870.2022-0496

基于叶绿体全基因组序列的双峰法鉴定粗茎秦艽及其近缘物种

SNP double peak methods through chloroplast genome profiling for identifying Gentiana crassicaulis and two closely related species

  • 摘要: 粗茎秦艽Gentiana crassicaulis Duthie ex Burk.为中药“秦艽”的基原植物之一, 而同为龙胆属秦艽组的西藏秦艽Gentiana tibetica King ex Hook. f.、粗壮秦艽Gentiana robusta King ex Hook. f.为其近缘的非国家药典品种。因存在较大的种内形态变异, 粗茎秦艽与西藏秦艽、粗壮秦艽间表现出较高的形态相似性, 且存在一定的同域分布, 为粗茎秦艽的鉴定带来了一定的难度。为有效鉴定中药秦艽国家药典品种粗茎秦艽与其近缘的非药典品种, 本文基于前期测定的粗茎秦艽、粗壮秦艽叶绿体基因组序列, 首次测定西藏秦艽叶绿体基因组序列, 筛选分子标记并构建这三个物种的分子鉴定方法。结果如下: ①获得西藏秦艽叶绿体基因组序列, 长度为148 765 bp, 大单拷贝区(LSC)、小单拷贝区(SSC) 分别为81 163 bp和17 070 bp, 反向重复区(IR) 为25 266 bp; ②粗茎秦艽、西藏秦艽、粗壮秦艽的叶绿体基因组结构一致; 粗茎秦艽与西藏秦艽的重复序列、SSR分布情况一致, 两个物种间叶绿体基因组变异位点数仅为9; ③筛选同时对这三个物种有效鉴定的单核苷酸多态性位点(SNP), 并验证稳定性; ④建立SNP双峰检测方法, 对各物种及混合样品进行有效鉴定。本工作可为粗茎秦艽及其近缘物种的DNA分子鉴定, 以及相关藏药品种的整理等工作提供基础资料。

     

    Abstract: Gentiana crassicaulis Duthie ex Burk. is one of the plant sources of Gentianae Macrophyllae Radix (QinJiao). Gentiana tibetica King ex Hook. f. and Gentiana robusta King ex Hook. f. are relative species of G. crassicaulis. Due to the large intraspecific morphological variation, G. crassicaulis showed high morphological similarity with G. tibetica and G. robusta. And the distribution area of the three species overlaps to some extent, which makes it difficult to identify them. On the basis of morphological identification, the method of molecular identification of the three species was constructed in this study based on chloroplast genomes. The chloroplast genome of Gentiana tibetica is 148 765bp long, with LSC, SSC and IR 81 163 bp, 17 070 bp and 25 266 bp, respectively. The structure of the three is consistent. The chloroplast genome sequences of G. tibetica and G. crassicaulis are highly similar, and the number of variable sites is 9 (149 267 bp in total). Diagnostic SNP that could effectively identify the three species was screened and verified, and a dual-peak SNP detection method was established for the effective identification of each species and mixed samples. Our study provides basic data for the molecular identification of G. crassicaulis and its related species, and the arrangement of related Tibetan medicine.

     

/

返回文章
返回