邓兰, 黄衡, 徐鸣夏, 周世清, 任昉, 王兴文, 李岱庆. 环维黄杨星D的前药改造及生物活性研究J. 药学学报, 2005, 40(9): 820-824.
引用本文: 邓兰, 黄衡, 徐鸣夏, 周世清, 任昉, 王兴文, 李岱庆. 环维黄杨星D的前药改造及生物活性研究J. 药学学报, 2005, 40(9): 820-824.
DENG Lan, HUANG Heng, XU Ming-xia, ZHOU Shi-qing, REN Fang, WANG Xing-wen, LI Dai-qing. Prodrug structural modifications of cyclovirobuxine D and their biological activityJ. Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica, 2005, 40(9): 820-824.
Citation: DENG Lan, HUANG Heng, XU Ming-xia, ZHOU Shi-qing, REN Fang, WANG Xing-wen, LI Dai-qing. Prodrug structural modifications of cyclovirobuxine D and their biological activityJ. Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica, 2005, 40(9): 820-824.

环维黄杨星D的前药改造及生物活性研究

Prodrug structural modifications of cyclovirobuxine D and their biological activity

  • 摘要: 目的通过对植物活性单体——环维黄杨星D的前药改造,以寻求疗效更好、治疗安全范围更宽的心血管药物。方法根据前药设计原理,设计合成目标化合物,并研究其生物活性。结果获得7个环维黄杨星D新衍生物,并经光谱证明其结构。结论选取部分环维黄杨星D新衍生物进行抗心律失常药理实验,结果表明部分化合物药理效果优于环维黄杨星D。

     

    Abstract: AimTo search for compounds for the treatment of cardiovascular diseases through prodrug structural modifications of cyclovirobuxine D, a single efficient composition distilled from Box plant in China, which was used to treat angina and myocardial infarction. MethodsAccording to prodrug design principle, a series of cyclovirobuxine D analogues were prepared, such as succinate, phosphate and amino acid ester, and their biological activities were tested. ResultsSeven new compounds were obtained and confirmed with 1H NMR, MS, and element analysis. ConclusionIn pharmacology experiment, for treating arrhythmia induced by aconitine, succinate and amino acid ester of cyclovirobuxine D (I and VII) showed better activities than that of cyclovirobuxine D. The normal rhythm of the heart duration of I and VII were (11.53±7.62) min and (12.68±9.25) min, compared with 0.9% NaCl solution and cyclovirobuxine D, (2.36±1.68) min and (10.25±6.59) min (P<0.01), respectively. Another pharmacology experiment, for treating arrhythmia induced by chloroform, the negative ratio of I and VII were 80% and 82%, compared with 0.9% NaCl solution and cyclovirobuxine D, 43% and 52% (P<0.05), respectively. The difference between new compounds and cyclovirobuxine D was distinct.

     

/

返回文章
返回