姜红, 丁黎, 杨劲, 黄鑫, 刘广余, 张正行. 曲美布汀分散片健康人体内的药代动力学及生物等效性研究曲美布汀分散片健康人体内的药代动力学及生物等效性研究J. 药学学报, 2004, 39(3): 208-211.
引用本文: 姜红, 丁黎, 杨劲, 黄鑫, 刘广余, 张正行. 曲美布汀分散片健康人体内的药代动力学及生物等效性研究曲美布汀分散片健康人体内的药代动力学及生物等效性研究J. 药学学报, 2004, 39(3): 208-211.
JIANG Hong, DING Li, YANG Jin, HUANG Xin, LIU Guang-yu, ZHANG Zheng-xing. Pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence of trimebutine dispersive tablet in healthy subjectsJ. Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica, 2004, 39(3): 208-211.
Citation: JIANG Hong, DING Li, YANG Jin, HUANG Xin, LIU Guang-yu, ZHANG Zheng-xing. Pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence of trimebutine dispersive tablet in healthy subjectsJ. Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica, 2004, 39(3): 208-211.

曲美布汀分散片健康人体内的药代动力学及生物等效性研究曲美布汀分散片健康人体内的药代动力学及生物等效性研究

Pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence of trimebutine dispersive tablet in healthy subjects

  • 摘要: 目的建立人血浆中曲美布汀的HPLC-ESI-MS测定法,研究曲美布汀在正常人体内的药代动力学行为,评价其两种制剂的生物等效性。方法血浆样品经碱化以环己烷提取,进行HPLC-ESI-MS分析,内标为西布曲明,检测离子为m/z 388(曲美布汀)、m/z 280(内标),裂解电压为50 V。20名健康志愿者交叉口服供试片和参比片,剂量均为100 mg。结果受试制剂及参比制剂的曲美布汀消除半衰期分别为(9.2±2.3) h和(9.2±2.8) h,达峰时间分别为(0.9±0.4) h和(1.0±0.3) h,峰浓度分别为(41±20) μg·L-1和(40±20) μg·L-1。以AUC0-24h计算的受试制剂的相对生物利用度为(97±13)%。结论本法灵敏、准确、简便。统计学结果表明两种制剂生物等效。

     

    Abstract: AimTo develop an HPLC-ESI-MS assay for determination of trimebutine in human plasma and to investigate the pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence of two trimebutine tablets in human. MethodsAfter being made alkaline with saturated sodium bicarbonate, plasma was extracted by cyclohexane and separated by HPLC on a reversed-phase C18 column with a mobile phase of 10 mmol·L-1 ammonium acetate buffer solution (pH 3.5)-methanol (18∶82). HPLC-ESI-MS was performed in the selected ion monitoring (SIM) mode using target ions at m/z 388 for trimebutine and m/z 280 for the internal standard (sibutramine, IS). The fragmentor voltage was 50 V. A randomized cross-over design was performed in 20 healthy volunteers. In the two study periods, a single 100 mg dose of each tablet was administered to each volunteer. ResultsCalibration curve was linear over the range of 0.3-150 μg·L-1. The main pharmacokinetic parameters of t1/2, tmax and Cmax were (9.2±2.8) h, (1.0±0.3) h and (40±20) μg·L-1 for the reference tablet; (9.2±2.3) h, (0.9±0.4) h and (41±20) μg·L-1 for the test tablet. The relative bioavalability of the test tablet was (97±13)%. The results of variance analysis and two one-sided t-test showed that there was no significant difference between the two formulations in the AUC and Cmax. ConclusionThe assay was proved to be sensitive, accurate and convenient. The two formulations were bioequivalent.

     

/

返回文章
返回